|
A
Wellingborough Councillor has been reported as saying
that if there were 17,000 wind turbines approximately
75' high across the country, they would provide us with all
the energy we need. Is this true?
No. The wind factory proposals for Airfield
Farm, Nun Wood and Emberton are all for turbines
much higher than 75' - five times higher in fact at 410’ (125m). Even
using this bigger turbine size this figure is way off the
mark. The UK consumes about 400,000,000MWh
(Megawatt hours)of electricity each year. The
most you could expect from 17,000 turbines that are
4 times that size
(ie those at Burton Latimer) would be about 282,948,000
MWh. However, for this to happen, the turbines
would have to generating at maximum output at all times.
How much does the wind blow in the United Kingdom?
Northern Ireland and Scotland have higher wind speeds than England, and coastal sites are obviously windier than
those inland. The DTI claim that over a year, a wind
turbine in the UK will produce on average, 27% of the energy
possible if it was generating at maximum output at all
times. This claim is of course meaningless when trying
to establish the merits of a specific site. In any case,
the unreliability of wind turbines means it would still
not be possible to supply the country with its needs. On
December 25th 2005 for example, almost no wind turbines
were turning anywhere in the country!
How much does the wind blow in Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Northamptonshire?
Well below the national average. For instance
the wind factory in Burton Latimer is providing very
little energy indeed. The latest figures show
that May, June and July 2006 produced energy, on average 11.84% the
time. The figure for July 2006 was just 7.66%. According
to the figures from the National Met Office the average local
wind speed in Bedfordshire, Buckingham and Northamptonshire
is so low that a wind turbine would generate its rated output,
on average, for around just 15% of the year. Obviously
the wind does not always blow at a time convenient to consumers
so much of that small amount of energy would have been generated
in the middle of the night. If the whole country had
as low a wind speed as we have in our area, it would
require 160,217 turbines to meet the national need, some
of the time.
How much space should be required to accommodate 160,217
wind turbines?
The land area required for this many wind turbines would
be 9 counties the same size as Northamptonshire. But
don't forget, we would still be left in the dark much of
the time because the electricity would not be generated on
demand.
Can the electricity be stored?
No. There is no reliable or economically viable
way of storing electricity generated by wind factories.
How
are the figures arrived at when people talk about
the number of households that will benefit from wind energy
generation?
Figures are often used to simplify difficult explanations. The
trouble with this is that they can be misleading. For
instance, it is said that the average household
consumes 4,800 kWh per year. This
is a very optimistic figure based on everyone making huge
efforts to save energy in the future. But assuming
we are all trying to do our bit for conservation, let's keep
to that. If a nearby wind factory (23MW) were
generating electricity 27% of the time, it would theoretically
be providing energy to 11,333 households but
only when the wind was blowing. Of
course, in Bedfordshire, Northants and Bucks this figure
would drop to 7,400.
What is the main complaint that people
have against wind power?
Although we are all keen to do whatever we can to support
renewable energy - and wind power sounds like a good idea
- large onshore wind factories are very inefficient and make
a huge negative impact on fragile rural environments.
With mounting concern about global warming, it goes against
the grain to see vast sums of money spent on a form of energy
generation which brings such small returns. It seems wasteful.
Even David Milliband, then Secretary of State for the Environment,
Food & Rural Affairs stated "...wind
energy will never supply base load requirements." Put
another way, it doesn't matter how many turbines you put
up, we still have to have another source of energy running
24 hours a day as back upbecause wind power is unreliable,
unpredictable and uncontrollable.
Would one solution be to have some of the nation's
energy generated by wind as a supplement to other sources?
You can only supplement with wind energy by turning off
another power source and this is difficult. Scientists
admit that because wind energy is so intermittent, it is
often impossible to plan ahead in order to accommodate
it on the National Grid. This means other sources of power
which are more reliable become surplus to requirements
and are – literally – wasted! This results
in higher carbon emissions and unnecessarily higher costs
to the consumer.
There must be a role for wind factories – why
else are they being built?
Developers find it very profitable to developonshore
wind factories because electricity providers are obliged
by government to buy a percentage of renewable energy
which is much more expensive than electricity generated
in other ways.
What about
off-shore wind factories?
In a recent poll, Peter Bone
MP asked his constituents their opinion on off-shore
wind factories and 89.2% were in favour of them.
It is certainly true that very large wind farms, many
miles off-shore, connected to the grid with high
voltage direct-current cables would increase the efficiency
of wind power. However this is very expensive. It
would require massive government support to make off-shore
wind factories as commercially profitable to developers
as those built on-shore.
How much CO2 does a wind farm save?
It obviously depends
on the wind farm. Large scale wind turbines like
the ones proposed at Airfield Farm will actually
generate large amounts of CO2 during their construction
and it will take months to neutralize their carbon deficit.
Once the turbines start generating electricity, wind
factory developers usually take the 30% capacity (or
load) factor recommended by the British Wind Energy Association
(BWEA) as the relevant measure of wind turbine efficiency,
electricity generation and carbon emissions avoided.
It is now public knowledge that electricity generated
and homes provided for are, at best, about 65% of that
claimed. Carbon emissions avoided are likely to be about
40% of those claims. However, there are other complications
to consider. Wind Factory developers claim CO2 emissions
savings based on the assumption that their wind energy
will only substitute for coal-fired generated energy.
This was declared a false calculation by the UK's Advertising
Standards Authority on December 21, 2005. If the UK were
to phase out nuclear there would be no saving of CO2
emissions by wind energy. If we take the full energy
spectrum, developers regularly claim 2.5 times the carbon emissions
savings that can be expected.
Is
it possible to generate reliable non CO2 emitting electricity?
Yes. Nuclear power does not generate CO2 and it already
meets 20% of Britain’s electricity needs. Hydro
electric schemes are efficient and reliable and Tidal
energy in the right places could make an important contribution.
There are also big strides being made in domestic generation.
Geo Thermal (drawing heat from the ground), Solar Panels
and Micro Wind Turbines are all already possible. When
the government fulfills its promise to support these
innovations, individual households will be able to take
more responsibility for generating their own renewable
energy.
What is CLOWD saying
to individuals who support renewable energy development
and are committed to playing their part in the fight
against global warming?
The Campaign to Limit Onshore
Wind Factories wants to see a responsible policy implemented
by local authorities that combines the provision of
a reliable, controllable and predictable low carbon
energy supply with adequate protection of our fragile
environment, countryside and communities. |