Clowd logo
CLOWD : Campaign
   
 
 
 
 
 

Letter from Head of Planning and Housing Services, Bedford Borough Council

Appeal by Nuon Renewables
Proposal Erection and operation of 9 wind turbines and associated infrastructure, including control buildings, on site tracks and underground cabling
Planning Application Number 05/02589/MAF
Planning Inspectorate Number W/0205/A/07/2060059/NWF
Location Airfield Farm, Airfield Road, Podington, Wellingborough, Northants, NN29 7JQ

I am writing to advise you that the above mentioned appeal has been withdrawn by the applicant and no further action will be taken.

Should a further application be submitted on the site you will receive further notification and again be given the opportunity to comment.

For further information please contact the case officer.

Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Section 78

Appeal by Nuon Renewables
Proposal Erection and operation of 9 wind turbines and associated infrastructure, including control buildings, on site tracks and underground cabling
Planning Application Number 05/02589/MAF
Planning Inspectorate Number W/0205/A/07/2060059/NWF
Location Airfield Farm, Airfield Road, Podington, Wellingborough, Northants, NN29 7JQ

Nuon Renewables have made an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate for England against the decision of Bedford Borough Council to refuse planning permission for the erction and operation of 9 wind turbines at Airfield Farm.

The Inspectorate will arrange for one of its Inspectors to hold a Public Inquiry into the appeal.

Any interested parties may attend or submit their views in writing. Further information is given in Guide to Taking Part in Planning Appeals, published by the Planning Inspectorate.

Details of the application which is the subject of the the appeal and the applicant's grounds for appeal may be inspected at Planning Reception, Town Hall, Bedford during normal working hours quoting reference W0205/A/07/2060059/NWF.

The period allowed for submission of comments to the Planning Inspectorate has now expired.

The statement of case submitted by Bedford Borough Council is available as a download.

A copy of the booklet "Guide to Taking Part in Planning Appeals" published by the Planning Inspectorate can also be obtained free of charge from the Planning Division, Bedford Borough Council (01234 221729).

Contact D K Bailey (Head of Planning and Housing Services) or Peter White (Planning Division) for any further information.

The Planning Inspectorate will notify the decision of the appeal only to those persons who request a copy in writing.

 
If you have already written to Bedford Borough Council your objection has been forwarded to the Planning Inspectorate.
 

For further information

If you would like to contact CLOWD on any of the issues concerning our campaign and the appeal lodged by Nuon please telephone Ros Pound on 01933 315132 or 01933 355173.

 

Background to the Campaign

Airfield Farm Windfactory is an ill conceived onshore development, which, if approved by your councillors, will damage the integrity of many rural villages. It will undermine local infrastructure.

CLOWD submitted an Objection to Bedford Borough Council based upon the Landscape and Visual Impact which outlines the enormity of the impact this ill conceived development will have on North Bedfordshire.

The leaflet giving the CLOWD objection, based on the Landscape and Visual Impact, is available by following the link : clowdLeaflet

Airfield Farm Windfactory is an ill conceived onshore development, which, if approved by your councillors, will damage the integrity of many rural villages. It will undermine local infrastructure.

The advantages of wind energy claimed and promoted by wind energy developers will not apply to this proposal since it is located in one of the least windy areas of the country. To date the Government has not evolved a sustainable energy policy. Increasingly people are realising the over-generous financial concessions provided by the Government are leading to unsuitable windfarm sites being selected.

Contrary to the information put out by wind farm companies, a report published by the Dti shows for the calendar year 2004, on-shore wind turbines functioned on average at 26.6% of their potential annual output (the corresponding figure for the far fewer off-shore wind turbines was 24.2%). Using data available from Ofgem, the figure for England for the same period was 23.8% (for Scotland it was 27.7% and for Wales it was 27.1%).

Low wind speeds recorded in our area show the Airfield Farm turbines will be operational for well under any of these figures. For further information see Wind Resource.

The flicker, glint and noise these massive turbines generate cause local disruption. When the intrusion gets too bad, residents frequently ask for them to be switched off or the blade speed reduced. This means even less energy is produced.

The social cost to communities includes loss of amenity, destruction of landscape, reduction in house prices, increased levels of stress and ill health, and conflict between neighbours.

The physical impact of these turbines on this beautiful corner, where the three counties of of Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire meet, will be wholly disproportionate to the minimal gain in wind energy to the country. There is a vast array of other renewable forms of electricity generation the UK could readily harness – offshore wind, wave power, tidal power, biofuel and biomass. Why are these not given greater priority?

Fighting a campaign of this nature is akin to David and Goliath. The collective power of wind energy companies and government policy is enormous. Professional public relations companies are employed by windfarm companies to reassure nearby residents during the planning phase and frequently succeed in selling the alleged benefits of wind factories.

The spin encourages people to support them. By the time the power station is under construction, it is too late to do anything. Communities are forced to start living with the difficulties, regretting they did not play their part in preventing the turbines being built in the first place.

 

Concerns

Information put out by the wind energy industry is misleading

Information put out by NUON Renewables in the context of the Airfield Farm, North Bedfordshire proposal is incomplete in terms of potential disadvantages to the community

The chosen site at Airfield Farm , Podington is within Bedford Borough Council's only designated Area of Great Landscape Value

The turbines will tower above Odell Great Wood - the remains of an ancient forest (this is one of only eight local areas with the national designation of Site of Special Scientific Interest for its unique flora and fauna)

Wind energy is free at the point of generation, but there are massive financial and environmental costs to building the infrastructure so the energy can be harnessed

Vibration and low frequency noise are noticeable from established windfarms more than 2kms away

Information provided to date has failed to consider or provide mitigating proposals for disturbance to the community from flicker, glint, and noise

Inadequate visualisation models of the development; disruption to bridleways and other rights of way

The cumulative impact on the landscape.

All have to be considered by the Planning Inquiry under the provision of current planning legislation.